Contact Us
Hearing Health Magazine
About Us Current Issue Subscribe Archive DRF Home Advertising Home
Archive
Print Page
 
 

I Would Choose Deafness Before a Cure from Embryonic Stem Cells

As printed in Hearing Health, volume 20:4, Winter 2004

By Tommie Wells

Stem cell research is a very controversial subject. I belong to several Internet discussion groups for which stem cells and their potential usefulness in alleviating the problems of deafness is a common topic. I have a cochlear implant and have had some degree of hearing loss for most of my life. My daughter is also profoundly deaf and uses two behind-the-ear hearing aids. Although because of hereditary late deafness there is a good chance that my granddaughters and future great grandchildren may become deaf as they age, still, I would not feel comfortable knowing a cure for deafness was developed by destroying human embryos.

There is a large amount of embryonic and fetal tissue destroyed every day - wasted tissue that could be used if there were some way to make it available. While I don’t strongly object to using tissue that would have been discarded anyway, I fear that making it available for research would just create more problems. Why? Because science, as such, has no conscience. Individual scientists may or may not have beliefs and ethics regarding sacrificing human life in efforts to advance knowledge, but science, as a discipline, is interested only in truth. There need not be a practical application - the truth in and of itself is considered enough justification.

I believe that once embryonic stem cell research has begun in earnest and with government funds, scientists will begin making embryos to order - embryos with specific characteristics. A human embryo is a human life. I feel it is wrong to cause the formation of an embryo just for the purpose of research with the destruction of that life as the end product. Harvesting stem cells, despite the good it might lead to, is not sufficient reason to destroy a human life. The further we go down this slippery slope, the harder it becomes to find a stopping place. I think it is better to stop now before we gain more momentum.

There are other ways to perform stem cell research than using embryonic stem cells, such as working with cord blood stem cells which are just as useful and can be harvested without doing harm to human life.

Proponents of stem cell research chide us for keeping the scientists in the United States from competing on a level playing field with researchers from other countries. That is just too bad! The United States was founded on Christian principles and I want to see that carried into our future. I want our greatness to be based on God’s Word and goodness. Our country has been greatly blessed by God. We should continue to honor Him in both our individual lives and in the collective life of our country.

Related Articles:
Stem Cells and Gene Therapy—Are We Expecting Too Much Too Soon
What Causes Hearing Loss?
Getting the Solution to the Problem Area
What is a Stem Cell?
Gene Therapy Already a Reality

 
 
 
 

2008 Archive

2007 Archive

2006 Archive

2005 Archive

2004 Archive

2003 Archive

 
 
 
 
InSight Cinema
 
About Us || Current Issue || Subscribe || Archive || Viewpoints || Advertising        © 2006 Deafness Research Foundation. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy