Contact Us
Hearing Health Magazine
About Us Current Issue Subscribe Archive DRF Home Advertising Home
Archive
Print Page
 
 

Softness Imperception Defining a Puzzling Problem

As printed in Hearing Health, volume 20:1, Spring 2004

By Mary Florentine, Ph.D.

You have hearing loss, this you know. You may be knowledgeable about many aspects of your condition based on discussions with your hearing healthcare provider. Chances are, though, that you are unacquainted with a newly-coined term for what may be a familiar hearing experience for you.

Take my friend Karen, for example, who has had hearing loss since she was a child. She recalls, “When I was little, it seemed to me that the other children never called my name in the usual way when they wanted my attention on the playground. They just screamed it and grabbed and pushed me in the direction they wanted me to go.”

In retrospect, Karen realizes that her playmates had probably attempted to call her several times before resorting to loud voices and physical direction. But why did she not hear them, at least softly, before they yelled at her?

Evidence is building that many people with sensorineural hearing loss have similar experiences. We call this phenomenon softness imperception (SI), referring to an
inability to hear soft sounds. This surprising finding challenges over 60 years of thinking in hearing science and adds greatly to the understanding of loudness perception. It also agrees with modern findings in auditory physiology, clinical observations and many aspects of current clinical practice.

Tests specifically for SI are not yet available although some experiments have been performed that give insight into the condition. Recognizing the need for methods of more definitive diagnosis, my colleagues and I at the Communication Research Laboratory at Northeastern University in Boston are currently involved in a large-scale study of the subject. After hearing about our study, a number of people with self-diagnosed SI have come to our laboratory and find that our tests often confirm their own observations.

Loudness is Subjective
To understand SI, it is helpful to understand a bit about loudness perception. Not everyone experiences loudness in the same way. One sound wave (that is, the physical vibration) can elicit different perceived loudnesses depending on the characteristics of each listener’s hearing. As in the illustration above, an ambulance siren may sound loud to someone in a nearby vehicle and soft to a person in the next one. Loudness is in fact quite subjective.

To further complicate matters, people do not use the terms describing loudness in the same way. Two people using the word “soft” may be reporting two very different perceptions. For example, a person with hearing loss who has never heard loudness in the usual way might use the term “very, very soft” to indicate the softest sound that he can hear. His actual perception may be closer to what others perceive and describe as “moderately soft.” Without special testing, it is impossible to know how a person is using a term.

There is one given in perceiving loudness: when the physical intensity of a sound increases, so does its loudness. However, two aspects of loudness perception vary among people: the softest sound they can hear (their hearing threshold) and the rate at which sound gets louder as it gets more intense. Different combinations of these dynamics result in four common types of loudness perception.

  1. Typical – As the name suggests, this type is how most people without hearing loss perceive loudness. When a sound is at a very low intensity and no one can hear it, we say it is below hearing threshold. When intensity increases, the sound is first heard as very, very, very soft. With each rise in intensity, perception of loudness increases at a corresponding rate. Eventually, sound gets so loud that it can be uncomfortable or even painful. Fortunately, most people have the good sense not to listen at this damaging level!
  2. Attenuation – The attenuation type of loudness perception is how most people assume everyone with a hearing loss hears: obstructed normal hearing, similar to plugging your ears with your fingers. The intensity at which sound is first heard is higher than in the typical type. Once sound reaches hearing threshold, it will be heard as very, very, very soft and then will increase in loudness at the same rate as in the typical type. Although attenuation occurs in some people, as in cases of impacted earwax, it is definitely not how most people with hearing loss perceive
    loudness.
  3. Rapid growth – People with rapid growth have a higher threshold at which sound is first heard, where it is perceived as very, very, very soft. As the intensity of sound increases, the perception of loudness grows at a very rapid rate that eventually catches up with near normal loudness at high physical intensities. Until recently, most audiologists and scientists assumed that people with sensorineural hearing loss experience this type of loudness perception, also known as recruitment, but now we are learning that some actually have SI.
  4. Softness imperception – In both rapid growth and SI, high intensity sound is usually heard as loud but there are two important differences. One is that a person with SI perceives a sound at the lowest audible intensity as louder than do people with any of the other three types of loudness perception. The first sound a person with SI can hear does not sound soft. The first few times Karen’s friends called her, the sound was not intense enough for her to hear but once she was able to hear them (just above threshold), their voices sounded quite loud.

The other difference between rapid growth and SI is the rate of loudness growth above threshold. People with rapid growth perceive a rapid increase in loudness as sound intensity increases. People with SI experience a more typical rate of loudness growth above threshold. Only when sound is considerably more intense does loudness increase at a somewhat faster rate until it catches up to typical, or near typical, loudness.

SI and the other types of loudness perception may be experienced to varying degrees and in varying combinations. For example, a person may experience attenuation due to one type of hearing loss and have SI due to another type.

Hearing Aids & SI
For people with SI, realistic expectations are essential for preventing dissatisfaction with hearing aids. Expecting that hearing aids will provide typical loudness perception can only lead to disappointment because they cannot restore the lost ability to hear very, very soft sounds. Hearing aids can, however, make sound with low physical intensity audible to them.

Although its loudness may seem strange, most hearing aid users can easily learn to identify the nature of an amplified sound. Whispered speech, for example, can be distinguished from normal speech even if both are perceived to be equally loud. Whispered speech has a different quality, sounding breathier to most people.
A frequent complaint of new hearing aid users with SI is that low-level sound, like from an exhaust fan, is irritatingly loud. By working with his/her hearing healthcare provider in post-fitting counseling and adjustments, a user may find the right compromise between making sounds s/he wants to hear audible and making sounds s/he does not want to hear too loud.

Although hearing aids cannot entirely compensate for SI at this time, simply having a better understanding of this aspect of hearing can lead to a better quality of life for both the people who experience it and those who interact with them. Misunderstandings can be avoided by anticipating the kinds of difficulties that are likely to occur.

One of the most common scenarios is a child being reprimanded for startling an adult who has SI. Children do not understand this type of loudness perception and are unsure what they did wrong. Such ongoing misunderstandings may have a negative effect on relationships.

Learning more about SI has been a big help to my friend Karen as she now understands that when she hears people call her name loudly and sometimes with a strident voice, it is because they have already called her in a lower voice several times. By the time she hears them, they may be frustrated and annoyed at her for not responding. They probably do not understand that she has a hearing loss and incorrectly assume that they are being ignored.

In addition to developing increased awareness of SI’s potential impact on her interactions, Karen has become quite adept at educating others about this aspect of her hearing. She tells me that most people are glad to know that they are not being
ignored and are happy to try to accommodate her.

My colleagues and I as well as other researchers and clinicians are eager to learn more about characteristics of SI and methods of diagnosis. The ultimate goal is, of course, to find the most beneficial ways to help individuals understand and successfully manage this aspect of their hearing loss.

Mary Florentine, Ph.D., is a Matthews Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Speech-language Pathology and Audiology and director of the Institute for Hearing, Speech & Language at Northeastern University in Boston. The internationally renowned researcher has prepared over 100 original publications and made several appearances in the media, working to make the latest knowledge in hearing science accessible to all.

She lives in Dover, Mass., with her husband Søren, daughter Julia and Oliver, her cat who thinks he is a dog and likes to play fetch. She wishes to thank Professor Bertram Scharf and Julia B. Florentine for helpful comments on this article and Julia for the illustration concept.

Related Articles:
From Pianissimo to Mezzopiano
Signs of SI

 
 
 
 

2008 Archive

2007 Archive

2006 Archive

2005 Archive

2004 Archive

2003 Archive

 
 
 
 
InSight Cinema
 
About Us || Current Issue || Subscribe || Archive || Viewpoints || Advertising        © 2006 Deafness Research Foundation. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy