Contact Us
Hearing Health Magazine
About Us Current Issue Subscribe Archive DRF Home Advertising Home
Archive
Print Page
 
 

When it Hurts to Hear

As printed in Hearing Health, volume 19:4, Winter 2003

By Marsha Johnson, M.S., CCC-A

Imagine not being able to leave your house because the sound of the door as it bumps against the jamb hurts your ears … or giving up your job because you cannot tolerate the whirring of the fan in your computer. Imagine that you nearly faint from the squeal of bus brakes. This is how it is for people who have hyperacusis.

Hyperacusis is a confusing term because it literally means “better than average hearing,” hardly an accurate description of a disruptive - even disabling - condition that may affect several million people in the U.S. alone. The term refers instead to a change in a person's auditory system that causes ordinary sounds or noises to seem unbearably loud. By creating significant anxiety and apprehension, hyperacusis can also contribute to a deterioration of general physical health and lead to negative changes in lifestyle. Associated conditions frequently include insomnia, depression and loss of
sexual drive.

People who develop severe cases often go to great lengths to diminish the impact of environmental sounds, including moving to new homes, purchasing quieter vehicles or isolating themselves socially. One woman removed all the electrical appliances from her home, moving her refrigerator to a nearby garage, in order to escape having to hear the operation of each device. Although this may seem an extreme reaction, it is in reality a rational strategy for a person in her situation.

Most individuals with hyperacusis employ earplugs and earmuffs to avoid exposure to external noises, a more practical coping strategy. It has been shown, however, that utilizing ear protection can worsen the condition, causing affected people to use more and more, sometimes several pairs of earplugs at once, further exacerbating their situation.

Although clinicians have been aware of the condition for well over 30 years, the medical and audiological communities were slow to delve into its characteristics and causes. As recently as 1997, an Internet search with the keyword hyperacusis resulted in 11 references to sites containing information. Today, a similar search produces over 14,000 hits!

For some time, it was most often mentioned as a side effect of other primary
diseases or serious medical conditions (e.g., aneurysm, head injury, etc.) but findings are gradually revealing that hyperacusis could be a primary condition. As a result, it is now the specific focus of several research projects.

Hyperacusis has been linked most often with tinnitus, phantom auditory perceptions that include ringing or chirping in the ears. In fact, it was the 1985 discovery by Drs. Pawel Jastreboff, now at Emory University in Georgia, and Jonathan Hazell, The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Centre in London, of a strong correlation between the two conditions that helped ignite the recent surge in scientific interest in hyperacusis.

During their research in quest for new treatment protocols for tinnitus, Jastreboff and Hazell found that about half of their patients also experienced reduced sound tolerance. Applying that formula to current estimates by the American Tinnitus Association that 17 to 43 million Americans have some degree of tinnitus, we can guess that 9 to 22 million have some level of hyperacusis. Although the relationship has yet to be defined, both clearly are symptoms that reflect auditory system disorder.

It appears that both the peripheral (outer and middle ear and cochlea) and central (brainstem and central nervous system) portions of the auditory system are involved in hyperacusis. Frequently, affected individuals detect abnormal hearing in only one ear but within a few days or a week, the vast majority develop bilateral hyperacusis. Sometimes people notice a more gradual deterioration of their sound tolerance levels accompanied by distortion of certain sounds, such as voices or music.

The exact etiology is unknown but there are promising studies that point to the part of the auditory system that regulates instructions from the central nervous system. Every incoming signal is analyzed and responded to instantaneously by the central nervous system. For example, the tiny sensations of very soft sounds are amplified by exaggerated movements of the delicate hair cells in the cochlea. Very loud sounds are dampened or inhibited by actions of the middle ear muscles and bones.

It is theorized in the case of hyperacusis that the central nervous system does not respond properly to the incoming signal, miscuing the amplifying or dampening actions of the cochlea and middle ear. This creates a situation where an ordinary level of sound, conversational noise for example, is perceived as if it were as loud as a jet engine roar.

These problems in central auditory system function can occur following a head or neck injury, allergic reactions to pharmaceuticals, ototoxic anti-cancer drugs, viral or bacterial infections, systemic diseases (e.g., autoimmune disorder, Lyme disease, etc.), mastoiditis or chronic otitis media. Acoustic trauma due to abrupt pressure changes or excessively loud noises can also upset the balance between excite/inhibit functions in the fragile auditory system.

Hyperacusis related to head injuries is particularly understudied at this time. It can be very challenging to root out the factors that contribute to this result. High precision imaging, such as CT scans or MRIs or PET scans, do not reveal any visible abnormalities in these cases. In addition, onset of hyperacusis and tinnitus can be delayed as much as a few weeks post trauma. In April 2004, our clinic will present new research on this topic that supports the direct correlation of closed head injuries and the emergence of these auditory disorders.

In all cases, diagnosis and evaluation of hyperacusis can be time-consuming and the process is fraught with challenges directly tied to the secondary psychological conditions that nearly always accompany it. Among them is phonophobia, a fear of sound. Severely phonophobic people may believe that even very soft sounds will permanently damage their hearing. This causes tension and even panic in a variety of settings, including a hearing examination.

Another condition, misophonia, has now been identified and is characterized by hatred of sound. People can have one or both, adding to the difficulty of making the important clinical distinction between them. Working with a coordinated care circle of medical providers, including psychiatrists, can be appropriate in these cases.

Once a diagnosis is made, treatment options do exist. In the mid-1980s, Jastreboff and Hazell themselves developed a technique, Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT), that helps many patients to show improved sound tolerance over time and it has become the primary treatment choice for hyperacusis.

Patients often benefit from the counseling component of TRT alone or in combination with a rich auditory environment. Another facet of TRT entails the application of broad band sound to stimulate the entire cochlea in a controllable way via bilateral ear-level devices. According to a clinical study released by Jastreboff and Dr. Margaret Jastreboff in 2003, this method often produces dramatic results in about six months and over 80 percent of treated individuals may achieve complete recovery from hyperacusis.

Alternatively, pharmaceutical therapies are prescribed, including anti-depressants, anti-anxiety and anti-obsessive compulsive medications. Unfortunately, many of these medications induce undesirable side effects, such as lethargy and fatigue.

Thousands of people have been diagnosed with hyperacusis, received appropriate treatment, recovered and returned to a normal life. This good news needs to reach people suffering unnecessarily.

Medical professionals – from primary care physicians to neurotologists, audiologists and psychiatric specialists – must also be made aware of how to diagnose and treat hyperacusis. And finally, the insurance industry must be included so that treatment is eligible for coverage.

With access to information and a supportive team of professionals, people whose lives are now disrupted by hyperacusis are able to recover. Everyday sounds need no longer be something to fear.

Marsha Johnson, M.S., CCC-A, is director of the Oregon Tinnitus & Hyperacusis Treatment Clinic in Portland, Ore., a member of the Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Association and a fellow of the American Academy of Audiology. She founded the American Hyperacusis Association in 1999 and has conducted research into autism in children and hyperacusis associated with head injury. Readers can contact her at 503.234.1221 or Oregon7@aol.com.

American Hyperacusis Association
www.hyperacusis.org
www.hyperacusis-info.org

Oregon Tinnitus & Hyperacusis Treatment Clinic
www.tinnitustreatment.org
www.tinnitus-audiology.com

The Hyperacusis Network
www.hyperacusis.net

American Tinnitus Association
www.ata.org
800.634.8978

Tinnitus & Hyperacusis Center
www.tinnitus-pjj.com

The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Centre
www.tinnitus.org

 
 
 
 

2008 Archive

2007 Archive

2006 Archive

2005 Archive

2004 Archive

2003 Archive

 
 
 
 
InSight Cinema
 
About Us || Current Issue || Subscribe || Archive || Viewpoints || Advertising        © 2006 Deafness Research Foundation. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy